The Hawaii State Legislature A $50 Visitor Impact Fee in Hawaii could be an important and effective way to earn additional revenue To offset the impact of visitors and ensure a healthy environment for future generations. This is due to Senate Bill SB304, which would return to the 2024 regular legislative session, which begins today and runs through May.
In summary, this bill seeks to establish a visitor impact fee program within the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) beginning July 1, 2025. The bill provides that DLNR “collect a fee from visitors for state park visit permits.” forests, hiking trails, or other natural areas of the state; Once paid, you will be granted access for one year.
From visitor impact to climate impact: Hawaii rates rebranded.
In the aftermath of Maui’s devastating Lahaina fire, Hawaii Governor Josh Green revised the concept around the $50 Green Fee, previously known as the Visitor Impact Fee. The fee, originally proposed to generate hundreds of millions of dollars annually, is also intended to address challenges posed by the state’s tourism-related infrastructure and strengthen firefighting efforts. However, previous attempts to introduce such fees have faced constitutional and logistical problems and needed a do-over.
An evolution of the $50 Hawaii visit fee was proposed.
Initially, Governor Green proposed a broad visitor tax. It goes back to his candidacy for governor of Hawaii. However, this faced legislative and other obstacles, prompting the state to shift to a tax only on the use of beaches, parks, and facilities. The idea of assessing fares through airlines and lodging establishments was once considered, but abandoned primarily due to constitutional concerns. Restructured fees for state parks, beaches, and other facilities were subject to uncertainty as to their effectiveness and enforceability.
The company plans to issue permits and licenses to visitors online through its website and app, or through its stores. That has not yet been clarified.
Hawaii has a problem with the proper use of visitor funds.
Hawaii has a history of struggling with the effective use of visitor (and resident) taxes and fees, with results often falling short of intended goals. The highest lodging tax in the United States is paid by tourists (and travelers alike), raising questions about its use. The apparent lack of reinvestment in critical tourism infrastructure, from parks to airports, remains a concern, especially when compared to other well-known holiday destinations around the world.
Impact on visitor perception.
As the state of Hawaii considers reintroducing green fees, concerns are being raised about the potential negative impact on visitors. Many people have complained about the proposed fees, seeing them as an additional financial burden. Imposing such a fee could meet resistance as Maui tries to regain tourism after the Lahaina fire.
Fund Hawaii’s firefighting efforts.
Given both the Maui wildfires and the recognition that similar fires can cause the frequent droughts that hit Hawaii, no one questions the need for better firefighting. Governor Green justifies the new green fee by emphasizing the need for additional funding for these firefighting efforts. The fund is intended to help hire more firefighters, acquire equipment and fund investigations related to incidents like the Lahaina fire. However, there is widespread skepticism about the allocation of funds to the “special fund” and the ability of the state to manage these resources responsibly.
Urgent need for fire services and state fire marshals.
Hawaii’s fire service faces challenges, most notably the continued absence of a state fire marshal. That position was abolished decades ago. But this year, the Legislature will consider a number of bills aimed at restoring the state fire marshal position.
Hawaii is considering reinstating the $50 green fee.
The state is working to find effective ways to fund both critical infrastructure and firefighting efforts. Although the environmental impact fee proposal is well-intentioned, it has been met with skepticism because of Hawaii’s poor track record of managing visitor-related funds and addressing pressing issues.
SB304_HD3_Hawaii-Visitor Fee-Proposal