SEven a hundred Years ago, the maritime trade routes that stretched from the coast of Japan to the Red Sea were lined with Arab dhows, Chinese junks, and Javanese jhangs, transporting ceramics, precious metals, and textiles throughout the region. In its center, a trading post known as Singapura flourished. The vast commercial networks within Asia were only disrupted by the arrival of sailors from the emerging European empires and by the emergence of markets for distant Asian products.
Another reconfiguration is currently underway. His late 20th century “Factory Asia” model, in which the continent produced goods for American and European consumers, provided a surprising boost to the prosperity of China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. In 1990, only 46% of Asian trade took place within the continent, as vast quantities of goods flowed to the West. However, by 2021, the figure had reached 58%, approaching the European level of 69%. The expansion of regional trade has also increased the flow of capital, further tightening constraints between countries. A new era of Asian trade has arrived that will reshape the continent’s economic and political future.
Its emergence began in the 1990s with the growth of sophisticated supply chains, first centered in Japan and then in China. Intermediate goods (components that eventually become part of finished products) soon began moving across borders in large quantities. Next is foreign direct investment (FDI). Asian investors currently own 59% of the stock. FDI Investment in the home region, excluding the financial hubs of Hong Kong and Singapore, increased from 48% in 2010. In India, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea and Japan, the share of Asian direct investment increased by more than 10 percentage points, to 26% and 61%.
After the global financial crisis of 2007-2009, cross-border banking also became more Asian. Before the crisis, local banks accounted for less than a third of the region’s overseas lending. Taking advantage of the withdrawal of Western capitalists, they now account for more than half of the population. China’s giant state-owned banks are leading the charge. Overseas lending by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China more than doubled from 2012 to last year, reaching $203 billion. Japan’s megabanks, like Singapore’s United Overseas Bank and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation, are also expanding to escape the narrow domestic gap.
The presence of Western governments has also declined. A recent survey of Southeast Asian researchers, businesspeople, and policy makers found that Isea– According to Singapore’s Yusof Ishak Institute, about 32% of respondents said they considered the United States to be the most influential political power in the region. However, only 11% of respondents named it the most influential economic power. State-led investment from China to other parts of the continent under the Belt and Road Initiative has garnered attention, but government aid and government-backed investment from Japan and South Korea is also increasing.
These trends are likely to accelerate further in the future. Faced with deteriorating U.S.-China relations, companies in the region that rely on Chinese factories are looking to India and Southeast Asia for alternatives. At the same time, few executives expect to move away from China completely, which means doubling investment and requiring two Asian supply chains. Trade agreements will accelerate this. Research published last year suggests that the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, a broad but shallow agreement signed in 2020, will increase investment in the region. By contrast, Asian exporters are unlikely to gain greater access to the U.S. market as a result of the U.S. abandoning the Trans-Pacific Agreement trade deal in 2017.
The need to establish new supply chains means transport and logistics are also likely to see increased investment within Asia, notes Savita Prakash. administrator Capital is a private financial company. Matching investors looking for a guaranteed income with projects looking for financing is the mission of these private credit companies, and while it has been a lucrative pastime in Asia, it could become an even more attractive pastime in the future. expensive. The size of the private credit market in Southeast Asia and India increased by about 50% from 2020 to mid-2022, reaching about $80 billion. Other big investors are also eyeing infrastructure. jicSingapore’s sovereign wealth fund, which manages some of the country’s foreign exchange reserves, is investing heavily in building the buildings needed for new supply chains.
Savings and demographic changes in Asia will also accelerate economic integration. China, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan have elevated their status as foreign investors, becoming some of the world’s largest investors. These richer and older regions of the continent have been exporting astonishing amounts of capital to other parts of the region, along with cash following recently established trade links. In 2011, Asia’s richer, older countries invested approximately $329 billion in current dollars in younger, poorer countries such as Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand. Ten years later, that amount had increased to $698 billion.
silk flow
India and Southeast Asia are “still urbanizing, and capital is following that trend,” says Raghu Narain of investment bank Natixis. Not only do big cities require more infrastructure investment, but they can also allow the growth of new companies that are better suited to city life. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions in Asia (meters&beNarain said activity is changing and becoming more similar to what is seen in Europe and North America. Despite a significant slowdown in trade with China, meters&be The activity also became more common elsewhere. Japanese banks, faced with low interest rates and slow domestic economic growth, are eager to make deals.Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group and Mitsubishi Corporation over the past year UFJ The Financial Group acquired financial companies in Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam.
Meanwhile, rising consumption in Asia is making the region’s economy more attractive as a market. In Europe, around 70% of consumer goods are imported from local regions, compared to only 44% in Asia. This may change. According to research firm World Data Lab, about 91 million of the 113 million people expected to join the global consumer class next year (spending more than $12 a day in 2017 dollars, adjusted for purchasing power) people will live in Asia. Even as China’s income growth slows after decades of expansion, other countries will pick up the pace. 5 major economic powers ASEANThe region, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand, is expected to see imports grow by 5.7% annually from 2023 to 2028, the fastest rate of any region.
![](https://www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20230923_EPC653.png)
These regional trading patterns will signal a return to more normalcy. The global export model that brought First World living standards to much of Asia and encouraged investment from far away was the product of unique historical circumstances. The amount of goods shipped to America from the continent’s industrial cities is much greater than would be expected from the relative sizes of their respective export and import markets, as well as the distances between them. In fact, in a paper by the Institute of Economic Research, ASEAN East Asia suggests that machinery exports from Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia to North America in 2019 were more than double the numbers these factors would suggest.
As commercial ties grow closer, the business cycles of Asian economies will become even more closely linked. Despite the continued use of the dollar in cross-border transactions and Asian investors’ continued preference for Western listed markets, a 2021 Asian Development Bank study found that Asian economies now favor China more than the United States. It concludes that the country is exposed to the spread of economic shocks. The situation has become more pronounced in recent months as China’s trade slump has hit South Korean and Taiwanese exporters. Increased trade in finished goods for consumption, as well as intermediate parts, means that currency and monetary policy decisions on the continent will become increasingly synchronized.
This will have political implications. The United States will maintain its influence over Asia’s security, but its economic importance will decline. Local businessmen and policy makers will be more interested in and receptive to neighboring countries rather than distant customers and countries. The high point of regional integration has not yet been reached, as local factories are still being built, consumption is expanding, and there is ample savings from Asia’s aging savers desperate to finance projects. The new era of Asian commerce will be less Western-oriented and more regionally focused. So will the continent itself. ■